The midcentury mausoleum would be much more at home within the Crescent City, with more than a dozen constructed. With the notable exception of Hope Mausoleum, none were built in the New Orleans area. The new, midcentury modern community mausoleums would deliver.Īs discussed in Part One, New Orleans cemeteries were overwhelmingly uninvolved with the early twentieth century community mausoleum. And they wanted it to be maintenance free, clean, and without the cobwebs of yesteryear. The public wanted a new modernity to separate from the modernity understood by their grandparents. Where before the community mausoleum was marketed as, in part, affordable, the appeal of affordability was no longer as necessary. The gargantuan technological leaps made to fight World War II had come home in the form of stronger concrete, bigger buildings, and an age of unparalleled American prosperity. A culture that forty years previous had held funerals in the home and generally eschewed embalming now understood the funeral home to be part of “tradition” and embalming to be essential to sanitation.īut the world had also changed. ![]() In a way, the original allure of the community mausoleum had become part of American culture itself – the advertising had worked. But the American public itself had seen several generations, a Great Depression, and two World Wars go by. ( You can find Part One here.)īy 1950, the concept of the community mausoleum was forty years old. In both parts, we will examine New Orleans’ role in the community mausoleum movement. In this part, we examine their mid-twentieth century popularity from approximately 1950 to 1980. In this series, we examine the two periods of community mausoleum construction in the United States. Many that were constructed between the early 1960s and today remain in regular use, maintained by their owners and cherished by their stakeholders. Files for other localities are usually limited to published information.Īdministrative records include correspondence, proposals, fiscal records, and reports relating to the grants that funded the research, copies of the original guidebook manuscripts, and publicity materials.Community mausoleums – multi-vault, indoor structures that house dozens or hundreds of burials – are ubiquitous in the American cemetery landscape. ![]() Magazine articles, dedication booklets, exhibition catalogs, and other publications may also be included. Additional information may also be found in the Architect and Miscellaneous Research series.Ī typical file concerning a sculpture in Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo, or Lansing consists of an inventory form with a photograph, correspondence, interview notes, and newspaper clippings. ![]() The general files in each series contain information pertaining to more than one sculpture. The Michigan series is organized by city the others by the artist, title, or location of the sculpture, according to available information. Individual series document sculpture in Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo, Lansing, other Michigan cities, the United States in general, and Brazil. ![]() The bulk of the research files are organized according to geographical emphasis. The records consist of research data gathered between 19 and related administrative records.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |